Now, with the advent of Auto-Tune Pro, it has become more versatile and easier to use than ever before, thanks to a completely redesigned interface and powerful new processing, editing and navigation features. It includes both automatic mode for real-time pitch correction and effects, and a graph mode for detailed editing of pitch and time.įor twenty years, Auto-Tune has been a professional standard for pitch correction and a tool for selecting the most significant vocal effect in popular music. UAD Autotune Realtime Vs Autotune 8 & Autotune Live Do you already.ĭescription : Auto-Tune Pro is the most complete and advanced version of Auto-Tune. UAD Autotune Realtime Vs Autotune 8 & Autotune Live Can anyone do a comparison between these 3 Autotune apps using Apollo and maybe other thunderbolt interfaces such as the Ensemble, Clarett, & Quantum? Home & Mobile Rig Mac Pro 8 Core (16 thread) Drew's Apollo x8. Antares Auto-Tune Pro v9.1.0 Overview Auto-Tune Pro is the most complete and advanced edition of Auto-Tune.
It is full offline installer standalone setup of Antares Auto-Tune Pro v9.1.0 Crack mac for 32/64. Antares Auto-Tune Pro v9.1.0 Crack Free Download r2r Latest Version for Windows. The latest version has a new, simplified control panel for general use, but also retains the graph editor to allow for intricate pitch and time modifications, and can operate as an ARA plug-in to support this.
Auto-Tune Pro is the flagship product in Antares Auto-Tune product line. I've never tried Auto-Tune that I recall. I must admit Melodyne seemed very interesting. That's a problem.įor big projects, especially I'd be automating everything unless something is actually standing out, but you do you mate.Melodyne (Editor) vs AutoTune Pro vs Waves Tune. It just doesn't sound acceptably natural without stopping to tweak it, which takes time. And the Nectar auto function isn't perfect, but it's much better than the atrocious quality of Antares for this purpose. You can potentially fix an entire track to before you could've even loaded up some audio into the graphic mode.
Regardless, for efficiency's sake, you want to use the auto function for everything ideally, and modify trouble spots with automation and a spectrogram, which is done nearly instantly when you get a feel for the settings. You may like the slight differences in the UI (pencil tool is very cool), but you can't tell me that warbly mess sounds better than Melodyne, and it's still too clunky of a workflow to open that up except in the most dire emergency and in the case of that emergency, I'd be turning to Melodyne for better quality, not Antares graphic mode.
0 kommentar(er)
